[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: What happened to NFS on fedora 11?
- From: Frank Cox <theatre sasktel net>
- To: fedora-list redhat com
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: What happened to NFS on fedora 11?
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:03:45 -0600
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:47:36 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:35:40 -0400
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> > Do I have to edit every NFS mount line in my
> > fstab manually?
>
> Apparently I do :-(. I can only mount from older machines
> if I explicitly give "proto=udp" as a mount option, at
> least none of the other work-arounds I've tried have worked.
I just discovered that I have the same problem here. This computer is supposed
to mount two fileservers. One of the fileservers runs Centos 5 and the other
is an Intel SS-4000E (a dedicated fileserver that runs its own embedded Linux).
The Centos 5 server mounted fine, but the Intel fileserver failed.
My fstab is set up as follows:
fileserver:/nas/NASDisk-00002/files/ /mnt/fileserver nfs
defaults 0 0
After rebooting my computer last night when it finished updating to
nfs-utils-1.2.0-5.fc11.x86_64 the fileserver failed to mount. I found out
about it this morning when my overnight backup to the fileserver failed to work.
Running the mount command from the commandline tells me this:
QUOTE:
[root mutt frankcox]# mount fileserver:/nas/NASDisk-00002/files/ /mnt/fileserver
mount.nfs: requested NFS version or transport protocol is not supported
END OF QUOTE:
Using the suggested option "-o proto=udp", it mounted fine.
QUOTE:
[root mutt frankcox]# mount -o proto=udp
fileserver:/nas/NASDisk-00002/files/ /mnt/fileserver
END OF QUOTE
That worked and my Intel fileserver is now present on this computer again.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]