[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: [rhn-users] Server Problems - Please Help
- From: "Hattie Rouge" <redhat netgods us>
- To: <rhn-users redhat com>
- Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Server Problems - Please Help
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:41:02 -0700
I wouldn't use dynamic DHCP addresses on servers. You can use static
addresses or static DHCP addresses, depends where you want to make your
changes and how much money/effort you feel like putting into avoiding
DHCP single points of failure.
Dana Bourgeois
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhn-users-admin redhat com
> [mailto:rhn-users-admin redhat com] On Behalf Of Dmitriy Martynov
> Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 10:11 AM
> To: rhn-users redhat com
> Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Server Problems - Please Help
>
>
> No this is not a bug. The IP adress does not depend on the
> slot of the router the device is plugged in. Heck, I have a
> netgear router with 4 ports but I have 8 computers connected
> to it via other switches and my IPs are 192.168.0.100 -
> 192.168.0.108. I would actually recommend you assign your
> server a static IP, that way you won't have everything
> getting messed up everytime your DHCP decides to change the
> IPs of the devices around.
>
> Again - IPs are assigned to devices (meaning network cards)
> not router ports.
>
> Hope this helped.
>
>
> Joelle Stringer said:
> > I just figured out th problem. Many of you mentioned that
> it sounds
> > like port redirecin problem.
> >
> > I had all the ports pointing to the appropriate my 192.1698.0.4
> > because it is pluged into the 4th spot. This is the way I
> have always done it.
> > However when the power went out,it rename the fourth port to
> > 192.168.0.2. I didn't notice this renaming until I found t DHCP
> > table.
> >
> > So even though it has been plugged into the forth slot and
> it is being
> > forwarded to 192.168.0.4, that slot has been rename
> by the DHCP
> > able to 192.168.0.2.
> >
> > Is this a bug in the netgear router? Has anyone heard of
> this before.
> >
> > Thanks soooo much for everyone's help.
> >
> > Joele
> >
> >>>> bretm redhat com 06/28/03 05:47 AM >>>
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Joelle Stringer wrote:
> >
> >> This is what I get..
> >> [joelle titan joelle]$ /sbin/service httpd status
> >> httpd (pid 1018 1017 1016 1015 1011 1010 1009 1008 926) is
> running...
> >> [joelle titan joelle]$ [joelle titan joelle]$ /sbin/service sshd
> >> status sshd (pid 789) is running...
> >
> > Looks like those are both up and running fine... I'd guess
> it was your
> > routing or firewall setup.
> >
> > Make sure the output of:
> >
> > /sbin/iptables --list
> >
> > looks sane.
> >
> > --Bret
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rhn-users mailing list
> > rhn-users redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-> users
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
>
> > rhn-users mailing list
> > rhn-users redhat com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
> >
>
>
> Peace,
> --Dmitriy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhn-users mailing list
> rhn-users redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]