[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [rhn-users] New version on redhat - Fedora + RHN?
- From: "Luke Rosenthal" <lists luko org>
- To: rhn-users redhat com
- Subject: Re: [rhn-users] New version on redhat - Fedora + RHN?
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:11:35 +1100 (EST)
> I do hope that someone picks up the ball with the up2date service, maybe
> Novell/Ximian perhaps? Otherwise it's us monitoring cert and others
> like crazy, build and distribute.
How many man-hours do you think RedHat spends on this at the moment? I
reckon it's a profit turner for them. So when they discontinue it in
December, it's gotta be worth a bunch of people banding together and
either approaching RedHat with a firm comittment to paying the RHN fees to
keep it going, or forming a breakaway "RHN2" movement, either using the
current RHN code (if it's GPL'd) or somehow forming our own system with a
new client.
Hell, even just a repository that carries the critial updates & patches
for RH73, RH8 (and RH9 when it expires) so we've got a less-than-hurried
migration path, be it to another RedHat product or elsewhere. I don't
mind manually applying RPM's but monitoring CERT and manually patching
everything is gonna be a pain in the rectum.
Personally I'd be more than happy to donate resources to such a venture.. ??
Of course, all this assumes RedHat has no plan for us, which it may...
RedHat, can you clarify?
Luke
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]