[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
OFFTOPIC: list id on subjects (was Re: [Rpm-list] List has beenmigrated... )
- From: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <carenas chasqui lared net pe>
- To: Chris Garrigues <cwg-dated-60fb05b867f54c96 DeepEddy Com>
- Cc: Harry Putnam <reader newsguy com>, rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: OFFTOPIC: list id on subjects (was Re: [Rpm-list] List has beenmigrated... )
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:23:07 -0500 (PET)
<SNIP>
> > i know, i could done that using procmail but i don't mind getting all the
> > rpm-list mail to a mail folder without even taken a quick look at it.
> >
> > your mileage can be different than mine, but i don't mind 7 bytes more for
> > message.
>
> Some of us really do mine because the 7 bytes are right there where they are
> most annoying. If your mail tools aren't able to organize your mail
> w/o it, then you need new mail tools.
actually, i DO have tools than are able to organize the mail without it,
seems you didn't read my thoughts about it.
what i mean IS:
there are just 7 bytes/message, but make anyone WHO CARES the life easier
to know a message has come from this list before dumping it to a proper
archive
i CAN make all this work automagically using any of the hint tags on the
header like :
X-Loop: rpm-list@redhat.com
Sender: rpm-list-admin@redhat.com
but i usually READ my mail, but just processing it and dumping it without
any further reading to an archive is not what i would like to do with
rpm-list, which i really like reading
thanks for taking a time to read my thoughts.
regards,
Carlo
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]