[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: new tags for RPM
- From: Erik Troan <ewt redhat com>
- To: <rpm-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: new tags for RPM
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 11:10:17 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Alfredo Kengi Kojima wrote:
> RPMTAG_ESSENTIAL - a boolean flag telling whether this
> package is essential for the system to be bootable/usable
> (like glibc, bash etc) Removal of packages with this
> flag could be denied without the --force or equivalent
> option... or not, dunno.
Who gets to decide this? Bash is hardly essential for a Linux system, even
though most use it. Proper package dependencies make this moot (try to
rpm -e bash on your ssytem to see what I mean).
> RPMTAG_IMPORTANCE - tells how important the package is,
> in the same fashion as dpkg's Priority tag. Values for
> it could be numerical constants, like:
> RPMIMPORT_IMPORTANT 5
> RPMIMPORT_REQUIRED 4
> RPMIMPORT_STANDARD 3
> RPMIMPORT_OPTIONAL 2
> RPMIMPORT_EXTRA 1
Who decides what's important and what's not? This is awfully arbitrary, and
it's not clear that this would add real value to users, rather then just
confusion.
Erik
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand |
| |
| Linux Application Development -- http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad |
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]