[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Building RPM 3.x RPMs
- From: Jeff Johnson <jbj JBJ ORG>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Building RPM 3.x RPMs
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:29:45 -0400
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:55:52PM -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
> Is there any way to build an RPM that's compatible with RedHat 6.x version of
> RPM using RPM 4.x? The reason I ask is that I package a couple small apps and
> one of the developers has asked if there is any way I can create an RPM
> that's compatible with RPM 3.x.
You do this if running rpm-4.0.2 on a Red Hat 6.2 box; otherwise dependencies
from a Red Hat 7.x box will prevent packaging. Since you need to build
on a 6.2 box anyways, you might just think about building with rpm-3.0.5
rather than using rpm-4.0.2, that's pretty easy to do. However, since you've
asked, here's the hacks necessary to achieve backward compatible packaging
from rpm-4.0.2:
Adding --nodirtokens will represent filenames as in rpm-3.0.4, as well
as removing the Big Bad v4 in the rpmlead structure. There are still
rpmlib(...) dependencies that track incompatibilities in packaging, rpm-3.0.5
understands those already. If you need to produce packaging for versions of
rpm before rpm-3.0.5, you'll need to understand the incompatibility, and not
use the facility in your packaging. For example, don't use
Provides: foo = 1.2.3
to avoid silently acquiring a
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1
tracking dependency.
There's also the issue of how files are named in cpio archives, rpm-4.0.x
has added "./" to file names in the cpio archive so that "/" can be
represented. This is handled transparently in rpm-3.0.5, but can be turned
off by adding
# XXX legacy requires './' payload prefix to be omitted from rpm packages.
%define _noPayloadPrefix 1
to your build configuration if you need compatibility with even older versions
of rpm.
While I know of no reason why the above hacks can't produce packages that are
understood even as far back as rpm-2.5.x, I'd *still* suggest using rpm-3.0.5,
to build and not trying to mess with the above.
73 de Jeff
--
Jeff Johnson ARS N3NPQ
jbj@jbj.org (jbj@redhat.com)
Chapel Hill, NC
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]