Re: RPM 4.0 and 4.0.2 analysis, resolution, and patch.

[Eskil Heyn Olsen <eskil eazel com>]

Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:

> I hope that this has clarified what has turned into a somewhat ugly
> situation.  RPM is an essential component on many systems; as such, it
> needs to be heavily tested, especially for backward compatability,
> before it is released (officially or unofficially) so problems such as
> this do not happen in the future.

Nice work man, this info is really helpfull, thanks for it.

I would also like to apologize for partly being responsible
for the mess (of having Nautilus PR3 dep on 4.0.2). We did
this since it we couldn't use rpm-4.0-devel out of the
box, and I hadn't expected that there would be any major
changes between 4.0 and 4.0.2 - I'm sorry - I suck.

/dev/eskil
---