[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: %ifarch semantics



Circa 2002-Jan-03 18:16:51 +0100 dixit Bernhard Rosenkraenzer:

: On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Serguei Ostrovskii wrote:
: 
: > Presuming I am not mistaken, are there any means to have
: > the behaviour "Maximum RPM" describes,
: > something that would mean IA-32 ?
: 
: What you're looking for is
: 
: %ifarch %{ix86}

However, beware this comment at the definition of %{ix86} in
/usr/lib/rpm/macros (rpm-3.0.6):

  #----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  # arch macro for all Intel i?86 compatibile processors
  #  (Note: This macro (and it's analogues) will probably be obsoleted when
  #   rpm can use regular expressions against target platforms in macro
  #   conditionals. This change will be introduced after rpm-3.0.4).
  #
  %ix86   i386 i486 i586 i686 i786 i886 i986

Anyone able to confirm whether this will remain or not?

-- 
jim knoble | jmknoble@pobox.com   | http://www.pobox.com/~jmknoble/
(GnuPG fingerprint: 31C4:8AAC:F24E:A70C:4000::BBF4:289F:EAA8:1381:1491)

Attachment: pgp00003.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []