[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: define _prefix in *.spec
- From: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc linuxweasel com>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: define _prefix in *.spec
- Date: 17 Jan 2002 19:25:53 -0800
On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 18:23, Jim Knoble wrote:
[snip good arguments]
> As you can see, shell stuff is a complete and utter mess. Even after
> POSIX standardized a shell (which differed in subtle but important ways
> from the prior de-facto "standard"), it's still all but impossible to
> write a non-trivial shell script that's actually portable, and even
> more difficult to prove portability, let alone verify it.
However, RPM shell sections aren't intended to be non-trivial shell
scripts. They're, at best, "scriptlets", or micro scripts, and
shouldn't be any more than that. Really, you ought to be able to stick
to a portable set of commands for a spec file, it's a tiny amount of
code in the end. Most things should be handled by the
program/makefiles/configure script itself.
Greg
--
Portland, Oregon, USA.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]