Re: rpm-3.0 works, rpm-4.0.3 does NOT

[Jeff Johnson <jbj JBJ ORG>]

On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 01:52:06PM -0800, paul company wrote:
> Jeff Johnson wrote:
> 
> >
> > Yes, URL is optional.
> >
> > "accepts" != "works"
> >
> 
> Don't you think "accepts" should = "works"?

Sure, I think that.

But I can't demand that someone, somewhere, doesn't create a package named
	popt-1.6.4-SOMEVERSION-SOMERELEASE.i386.rpm
no matter how sick that package name is.

> And an appropriate (accurate and precise) error message should be printed.

Of course, but this isn't an error.

> I guess spec file error checking comes in release 4.0.4 :-)

No rpm-4.0.4 checks the same errors it alwasy has.

OTOH, you're having a brain fart :-)

73 de Jeff

-- 
Jeff Johnson	ARS N3NPQ
jbj@jbj.org	(jbj@redhat.com)
Chapel Hill, NC