[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rpm-3.0 works, rpm-4.0.3 does NOT
- From: Tim Mooney <mooney dogbert cc ndsu NoDak edu>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: rpm-3.0 works, rpm-4.0.3 does NOT
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 19:27:53 -0600 (CST)
In regard to: Re: rpm-3.0 works, rpm-4.0.3 does NOT, paul company said (at...:
>Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, URL is optional.
>>
>> "accepts" != "works"
>>
>
>Don't you think "accepts" should = "works"?
>And an appropriate (accurate and precise) error message should be printed.
>I guess spec file error checking comes in release 4.0.4 :-)
Read what Jeff wrote again. He's saying that
Requires: popt-1.6.4
means "my package requires a package named (exactly) popt-1.6.4"
while what *you* really want is
Requires: popt = 1.6.4
which means "my package requires a package named popt, and it requires
version 1.6.4 of that package"
He can't blithely flag
Requires: popt-1.6.4
as an error, because someone may have chosen to name a package
`popt-1.6.4'.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney mooney@dogbert.cc.ndsu.NoDak.edu
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]