[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RPM Version Number Sort Logic
- From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob tisbrasil com br>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: RPM Version Number Sort Logic
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:33:09 -0300
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:21:48AM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> Reading "Maximum RPM", as long as there is no dash in the version number,
> RPM should be able to handle version number correctly. In a situation where
> an older version is numbered 1.6.031 and a newer verision is numbered
> 1.61.032, will RPM handle this correctly when asked to do an update?
> Numerically, 61 is greater than 6 so it should be newer, but using an ASCII
> sort, "1.6." is earlier than "1.61".
$ rpmver 1.6.031 1.61.032
RPM version comparation tool - Version 1.2.2
1.61.032 is newer
[]s
--
Rodrigo Barbosa - rodrigob at tisbrasil.com.br
TIS - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" - http://www.tisbrasil.com.br/
Brainbench Certified -> Transcript ID #3332104
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]