[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
question re: best practices,
- From: Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas urgent rug ac be>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: question re: best practices,
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 23:47:26 +0200 (CEST)
Hi,
I find myself writing more and more specs for external packages I
download. Nowadays I first write the spec before installing stuff ;)
So I also started putting the specs I write in a CVS repository, and I'm
wondering how other people deal with this sort of thing.
Right now I tend to keep the version number of the original package in the
spec file name, so that I can backport fixes I make in newer spec file
updates to older versions of the package in case I still use those.
For example, suppose I package icecast.
I have icecast-1.3.11.spec which I put in cvs.
In the spec file, it has release number 2.
Then 1.3.12 comes out, I copy the previous spec to icecast-1.3.12.spec.
I change the release number to 1.
In this spec file, I also make some sensible fixes that could be useful in
1.3.11 as well (like, add an init script).
I backport this fix, up the release number for 1.3.11 to 3, and build
both rpms.
(This is only an example, btw ;))
Does it make sense to use the versions in the filename to be able to keep
track of older packages as well ? What do other packagers do ?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
The Dave/Dina Project : future TV today ! - http://davedina.apestaart.org/
<-*- -*->
P.S. You rock my world
<-*- thomas@apestaart.org -*->
URGent, the best radio on the Internet - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.rug.ac.be/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]