[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RPM 4.0.4 database verification failure
- From: Albert Chin <rpm-list thewrittenword com>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: RPM 4.0.4 database verification failure
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 13:10:00 -0500
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:00:26PM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:55:22AM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:13:08AM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:13:17PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> > > > Created a test package with 4.0.4 (built against DB 4.0.14) on Solaris
> > > > 2.6/SPARC and installed/removed it. Installation went ok. Removal
> > > > returned:
> > > > $ rpm --dbpath [dir] -e -vv [pkg]
> > > > ...
> > > > D: opening db index /var/tmp/db/Filemd5s mode=0x402
> > > > D: removing 8 entries from Filemd5s index.
> > > > D: closed db index /var/tmp/db/Filemd5s
> > > > rpmdb: Suspiciously high nelem of 4294967291 on page 0
> > > > error: db4 error(-30979) from db->verify: DB_VERIFY_BAD: Database
> > > > verification failed
> > > > D: verified db index /var/tmp/db/Filemd5s
> > > > ...
> > > > D: closed db index /var/tmp/db/Basenames
> > > > rpmdb: Suspiciously high nelem of 4294967289 on page 0
> > > > error: db4 error(-30979) from db->verify: DB_VERIFY_BAD: Database
> > > > verification failed
> > > > D: verified db index /var/tmp/db/Basenames
> > > > ..
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas? Tried the same package on Redhat 7.1 with rpm-4.0.4-7x and
> > > > didn't have this problem.
> > >
> > > There's a patch in 4.0.4 that fixes this. Problem is persistent in data, so
> > > a --rebuilddb is needed to eliminate entirely.
> >
> > So there is a patch in rpm-4.0.4.tar.gz to fix the bug in Berkeley DB
> > 4.0.14? What is the name of the patch file in the RPM tarball?
>
> It's not an rpm patch, it's a Berkeley db patch that wasn't included in
> db-4.0.14. The patch is in rpm CVS and tarballs produced since
>
> * Wed Feb 13 2002 Jeff Johnson <jbj@redhat.com>
> - reapply Berkeley DB patch #4491.
Ok, cool. This patch fixed it for us.
--
albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]