[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Bad rpmdb, where'd this come from?
- From: Harry Putnam <reader newsguy com>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Bad rpmdb, where'd this come from?
- Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 21:50:39 -0700
Tom Diehl <tdiehl@rogueind.com> writes:
>> Then running rpm -UvhF *.rpm on what was left
>
> I realize this is will not fix your problem but I am courious why you specify
> -U and -F on the same command line? I would think -U would override -F.
Probably a miss usage. My reasoning was that I wasn't sure -F alone
would get rid of previous versions. It has been working for me but
I've only used it in /var/spool/up2date after downloading updates so
if U is overriding F it wouldn't have bitten me in that environment.
Thanks for the heads up, it looks like the -U would indeed override
the -F which would probably be a `bad thing' in most circumstances.
Haven't yet tried your suggested fix for the rpmdb, but will be
reporting on that shortly
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]