On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 14:44, Peter Bowen wrote: > On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 14:19, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > > > Poorly designed or not, the existing spec file parser will have to be > > retained for quite awhile, probably forever. That does not have to stop > > development of a new and better (and alternative) XML parser. > > While the current spec file parser needs to stay around I don't know if I agree that it needs to stick around IN rpm. it might be better to have a separate tool that reads spec files and pushes them into the new format. that way it allows backwards compatibility but it forces you to move forward. -sv
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part