[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: broken src rpm
- From: Jeff Johnson <jbj redhat com>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: broken src rpm
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 18:43:12 -0400
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:34:28PM -0700, Karen Shaeffer wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 06:15:28PM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 05:28:56PM -0400, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> > >
> > > Can't we all just play by the same (macro) rules? :-)
> >
> > 'Twould be nice, but is unlikely to happen.
> >
> > FWIW, there's per-platform (i.e. vendor) configuration, so in principle
> > a
> > rpm -ba --buildformandrake foo.spec
> > could be attempted, but it ain't happening.
> >
> > rpm (and me) are somewhat at fault, because I've always been reluctant
> > to promote vendor to the same prominence as arch and os.
> >
> > Maybe someday ...
>
> I guess that's one of the real positives of going to the XML based spec
> files, where you are going to separate out the data (syntactic symantics)
> from the methods (scripts, etc.). It seems to me this will enable all
> transformations to be straight forward. So working with various vendor
> configurations is going to be much more manageable.
XML ain't gonna help vendors cooperate, no matter what, as open source
vendors is almost an oxymoron.
73 de Jeff
--
Jeff Johnson ARS N3NPQ
jbj@redhat.com (jbj@jbj.org)
Chapel Hill, NC
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]