[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rpmrc provides on irix
- From: Tim Mooney <mooney dogbert cc ndsu NoDak edu>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: rpmrc provides on irix
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:51:12 -0500 (CDT)
In regard to: rpmrc provides on irix, Steve Feehan said (at 12:35am on Aug...:
>However, irix seems to have a unique way of versioning
>libraries.
:-) IRIX, or at least SGI, has a unique way of doing a great number of
things...
> For example, libc.so.1(sgi1.0). How do I
>put this version information into the rpmrc? I've
>tried several variations:
>
> libc.so.1(sgi1.0)
If you run
/usr/bin/ls -1 /usr/lib/libc.so.1 | /path/to/your/rpm/find-provides
what does it output? I would suspect the line shown above,
libc.so.1(sgi1.0). If that's what it outputs, then that's what needs to
be in the rpmrc file.
Alternately, why not build a "virtual package", which has been discussed
several times on this list in the past, and is the recommended way to go
if you're using RPM 3.x or 4.x.
> libc.so.1 sgi1.0
That's definitely not right.
> libc.so.1.sgi1.0
That would only be correct if the `find-provides' and `find-requires'
scripts were still using the old-style separator between the library SO
name and the IVERSION. Running the command shown above should tell you.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney mooney@dogbert.cc.ndsu.NoDak.edu
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]