Re: How To Solve Problems While Relocating a Package Installation using Prefix

["Christian Goetze" <cg hq addamark com>]

> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Christian Goetze wrote:
>
>> >> [ custom packaging perl ]
>>
>> > "very hard"??? Wotta wuss ... ;-)
>>
>> Have you tried it? Remember that in the final production environment,
>> no LD_LIBRARY_PATH hacks or symlink hacks are acceptable... Wrapper
>> hacks are barely acceptable.
>
> Just so you know the person you were asking, "Have you tried it?" is the
>  maintainer of rpm (probably should be THE MAINTAINER, as he is the only
>  one at this point).  So, yes, I am sure he has tried it and then some.

ok, ok, apologies ;-)

anyway, I've just been biting my teeth off of trying to create a
relocatable binary perl package that contains the kind of modules that I
want and which does not rely on ugly wrappers on the production site.
--
cg