[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: segfault with just running "rpm -qa"
- From: Stephen Smoogen <smoogen lanl gov>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: segfault with just running "rpm -qa"
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:57:54 -0600
My first course of action would be to see if the Red Hat default 2.4.x
kernel showed this problem. If it doesnt then I would say it is
something in the latest test NPTL items that eneds to be looked at. I
would also get the latest rpm from either rawhide or rpm.org. Try to get
it update itself.
Once you have updated it and found it stable (if it is stable).. I
normally do a rpm --rebuilddb.
I will warn you it mostly out of habit versus knowing that it does
anything. I have found that a lot of things I do like rm'ing the __db
files is also habit and doesnt have any effect when I forget to.
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 04:32, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 24 September 2003 13:14, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > just now, i noticed that running a simple "rpm -qa" printed
> > > all of five packages, then segfaulted. i did the customary
> > > "rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db*", but the problem persists.
> > >
> > > thoughts? this is new, and a little disturbing.
> >
> > Did you do rpm --rebuilddb ?
>
> no, i wanted to get any advice before i tried something more serious
> like that. so is that the recommended first course of action, then?
> i'm still curious as to what happened underneath.
>
> rday
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-list mailing list
> Rpm-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
--
Stephen John Smoogen smoogen@lanl.gov
Los Alamos National Labrador CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 (note new #)
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]