RE: distro name

["Aaron Hanson" <a hanson f5 com>]

Hi-

	A search of the lsb core document, v1.3 and the v2.0 candidate,
do not mention such a file. Rodrigo, were you referring to an existing
standard, or just proposing one?

	Thanks...

-Aaron 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpm-list-bounces@redhat.com 
> [mailto:rpm-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rodrigo Barbosa
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 2:05 PM
> To: RPM Package Manager
> Subject: Re: distro name
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 01:27:53PM -0700, Jim C. wrote:
> > In the long run, I guess it really just isn't practical. You would 
> > think there would be a requirement for at least a link to a 
> filename 
> > that never changes.  I mean like if mandrake wanted to have 
> a specific 
> > file name for thier /etc/version file there should be a Linux 
> > standards base compliance rule that states they need to 
> have a link to 
> > that file such that the link is the same on all systems.
> 
> You mean, like /etc/lsb-release ?
> 
> - --
> Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@suespammers.org> "Quid quid Latine 
> dictum sit, altum viditur"
> "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFBD/38pdyWzQ5b5ckRAufHAKCMxaQTAAZNSO43X0hvpMoWQB92dwCgk5Ww
> khiVh4TzXuK683YfUVVk94k=
> =C/nl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-list mailing list
> Rpm-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
>