[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: distro name
- From: "Wichmann, Mats D" <mats d wichmann intel com>
- To: "Dag Wieers" <dag wieers com>, "RPM Package Manager" <rpm-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: distro name
- Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 07:30:22 -0700
>It would have been better if RPM has a standardized way to supply a
>package with its distribution information (from its own SPEC files).
>So that the dist definition is implied based on your distribution.
>
>JBJ wants to have consensus before implementing a scheme like
>that, but I cannot give him consensus and I wonder who could and
>what is needed for that. I think LSB should make something like
>this mandatory.
Maybe I'm missing something in the above proposal, but the
LSB is trying to reduce the need to do distro-specific builds,
and the suggestion seems to go in the other direction.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]