[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: distro name
- From: David T Farning <dfarning sbcglobal net>
- To: RPM Package Manager <rpm-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: distro name
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:36:27 -0500
Avoiding the issue of, if looking up the distro name is a good/bad
idea...
It is pretty non-trivial to determine stuff such as
processor/distro/version because every distro/proc seems to report it
slightly differently. Check out the source for yum or up2date for how
to do it in python.
Look at the definitive bash script in autoconfig/config/config.guess for
a deeper example.
David T. Farning -dtf
On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 21:12 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, Erik Slagter wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 21:00, Dag Wieers wrote:
> >
> > > How are you going to build cross-vendor packages when every vendor is
> > > having their own specific naming convention and libraries ? What 3rd
> > > parties are doing is removing all the dependencies from thei packages so
> > > that they will install. Making dependencies completely futile and having
> > > no guarantee they will work.
> >
> > Although using sonames as dependencies does help.
>
> Guess what, libraries differ on different distributions. And even when
> they are named the same, they may not be ABI compatible.
>
>
> > BTW I regularly install rpms from PLD and Mandrake on my FC system, no
> > problem. Sometimes I need to persuade them a little bit yeah.
>
> Good luck to you.
>
> -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
> [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-list mailing list
> Rpm-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
--
David T Farning <dfarning@sbcglobal.net>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]