[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Epochs in filenames
- From: Mariusz Mazur <mmazur kernel pl>
- To: RPM Package Manager <rpm-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Epochs in filenames
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:50:48 +0200
On środa 11 sierpień 2004 01:53, James Olin Oden wrote:
> Because, typically, epoch is used to deal with radical changes to versions
> such that there would be no sane way to determine generically from the
> version that this package should upgrade another package. That said, if
> you used a different epoch per distro then you would have to have a
> different epoch per distro per major version format change. Other than
> that using to deliniate the distro would not give you what you wanted.
> Say RedHat had epoch 0, Fedora had epoch 1 and Suse epoch 2, then that
> would mean that a RedHat package would always win, but if you were on a
> Fedora or Suse system that is probably not what you want.
I didn't know that inter-distro compatibility is an issue. Could someone that
uses packages from various distributions tell me if it gives any major
headaches?
--
In the year eighty five ten
God is gonna shake his mighty head
He'll either say,
"I'm pleased where man has been"
Or tear it down, and start again
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]