[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Request for comments on binary RPM patch packages
- From: "Wichmann, Mats D" <mats d wichmann intel com>
- To: "RPM Package Manager" <rpm-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: Request for comments on binary RPM patch packages
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 06:44:11 -0700
>We are desperately looking for an upgrade mechanism for OpenOffice.org
>2.x that prevents users from downloading the whole beast again and
>again. Therefor I would highly appreciate to have a patch or update
>mechanism integrated in rpm. I really enjoy the way SuSE does it and
>would like to see that mechanism becoming mainstream.
I was going to respond to the original by asking "what does suse
actually do" as they do have a patch mechanism. It doesn't seem
to save a whole lot, I'm looking at 9.1 i586 updates and for the
main package, 58224kb while the patch package is 49728kb - and this
is a minor update (build-number change, not minor version change).
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]