[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Are __db.00[123] lock files or not?
- From: Jeff Johnson <jbj redhat com>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Are __db.00[123] lock files or not?
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:34:08 -0500
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:26:50PM -0200, Andre Costa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought /var/lib/rpm/__db.00[123] were lock files, but I see they're
> always there on my box (even when I am not running any rpm-related app
> -- yum, apt-get, rpm, up2date etc.) and rpm seems to be fine. Is this
> ok?
>
They are not lock files, but rather files that contain lock names.
See the locks by doing
cd /var/lib/rpm
/usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_stat -CA
rpmdb_stat is just db_stat from db4-utils, see doco at www.sleppycat.com
or in the db4-utils package.
Yes, the __db* files are persistent.
Yes, there should be no locks displayed when rpm -s not running.
73 de Jeff
--
Jeff Johnson ARS N3NPQ
jbj@redhat.com (jbj@jbj.org)
Chapel Hill, NC
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]