[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
/usr/lib or /usr/libexec?
- From: Toralf Lund <toralf procaptura com>
- To: RPM Mailing List <rpm-list redhat com>
- Subject: /usr/lib or /usr/libexec?
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:57:09 +0100
OK, I know this is somewhat off-topic, but it seems to me that people
who read this will be the most likely to have an answer for my questions:
I'm creating a package containing a number of DSOs that are considered
internal to the package, so I don't want to install them directly on
/usr/lib, but rather use a package specific directory also linked into
the RPATH or RUNPATH of my programs. Where should I install this
directory? There seem to be two alternatives:
1. /usr/lib/<package>
2. /usr/libexec/<package>
Which would be the right one to use? And what if I include "internal"
executables, too? Should these go in lib or libexec?
BTW, as far as I can tell, the FHS doesn't even mention libexec. Or
should I interpret it as one case of "Alternate format libraries" as
described in section 4.8?
- Toralf
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]