[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: /usr/lib or /usr/libexec?
- From: Scot Mc Pherson <scot linuxfromscratch org>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: /usr/lib or /usr/libexec?
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:27:50 -0500
*/lib is reserved for libraries generally
*/libexec is reserved for executables initiated by an already runing program.
linux from scratch limits the use of libexec and we use the option
--with-libexec=/usr/bin or /usr/sbin in most cases to eliminate a libexec
directory which ends up holding very very few files at all.
I suggest you use /usr/lib for your things. But why do you want to keep them
separated into subdirectories? One of the reasons for using package
management systems is to eliminate this need of separating each package into
subdirectories.
--
Scot Mc Pherson <scot@linuxfromscratch.org>
http://linuxfromscratch.org/~scot/
Usenet Server Admin, IRCop, RPM Maintainer
ICQ: 342949
AIM: ScotLFS
MSN: behomet@earthlink.net
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]