[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
How to handle requires/provides with DSOs are in non-standard locations?
- From: Toralf Lund <toralf procaptura com>
- To: RPM Mailing List <rpm-list redhat com>
- Subject: How to handle requires/provides with DSOs are in non-standard locations?
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:35:19 +0100
Another question related to the setup I described in another post
earlier today:
Let's say I have a package 'A' containing an application 'a' and a lib
'b' that I don't want to share with everyone, and therefore install on,
say, /usr/lib/A, i.e. I have
/usr/bin/a
/usr/lib/A/libb.so.1
Or similar. 'a' is linked with -rpath '/usr/lib/A' -lb, so it will load
/usr/lib/A/libb.so.1 on startup (and not, if it exists,
/usr/lib/libb.so.1), while the runtime linker won't find it for other
programs that may be linked with (a different) libb. This setup has one
problem already: Package A will by default provide libb.so.1 even though
it's not available for general use.
Question 1: What's the best way to avoid that.
Now, I actually want a more complex setup. I want to have
Package A:
/usr/bin/a
Package A-libs:
/usr/lib/A/libb.so.1
The question is how I describe the dependency between A and A-libs. If
I assume they are alone in the world, the default Autoreqprov setup is
fine, but like I mentioned above, I really don't want anyone else to see
that libb.so.1. Essentially, I want to say
A-libs provides libb.so.1, but only for the use by package A.
Is this possible? Or is there a better way to handle the dependencies?
Obviously, I could drop all references to libs, and have dependency on
(virtual) packages instead, but this doesn't seem very neat... Any other
suggestions?
- Toralf
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]