[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: What is up with BuildRoot ?
- From: Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
- To: RPM Package Manager <rpm-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: What is up with BuildRoot ?
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:53:43 +0200
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 08:44:17AM -0500, Tim Mooney wrote:
> > For a build POV, $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is an added prefix to the install path.
>
> Which is pretty much what "prepends" means, and how I interpreted what
> Anh said. ;-)
But Anh was referring to the %files section. IMHO, the %files section
is a list of filepaths that will be included in the target package, so
talking about "prepending" directories there sounds confusing.
> From an install point of view, or an %install point of view? I tend to
> think of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT from a *build* point of view, possibly because of
> that _BUILD_ in the middle of the env. I pretty much never think of it
> as something that gets deleted at some later point. To me, it's something
> that's there during the build process (which, in my little conceptual
> world, includes %install).
Well, if you consider %files just as the target tree and remember that
this tree can be found below $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, no directory names have
to be prepended or removed from the filenames at all... :-).
--
-- Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]