[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Doesn't "rpm -e" erase in reverse dependency order?
- From: Christian Goetze <cg sensage com>
- To: Rpm-list redhat com
- Cc:
- Subject: Doesn't "rpm -e" erase in reverse dependency order?
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:56:02 -0800
It would seem that it doesn't.
--
cg
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]