Re: Doesn't "rpm -e" erase in reverse dependency order?

[Frank Cusack <fcusack fcusack com>]

On February 23, 2006 8:30:14 AM +0100 Jos Vos <jos xos nl> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 06:56:02PM -0800, Christian Goetze wrote:
>
> > It would seem that it doesn't.
>
> No, it doesn't, just like it doesn't install them at install time.

Sure it does.  If I 'rpm -i foo.rpm bar.rpm baz.rpm', they are installed
in the correct order based on dependencies.  Or did I just imagine that?

-frank