[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Doesn't "rpm -e" erase in reverse dependency order?
- From: Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
- To: RPM Package Manager <rpm-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Doesn't "rpm -e" erase in reverse dependency order?
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:31:52 +0100
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 12:31:45PM -0800, Frank Cusack wrote:
> Sure it does. If I 'rpm -i foo.rpm bar.rpm baz.rpm', they are installed
> in the correct order based on dependencies. Or did I just imagine that?
Yes, but that was not what then question was about, AFAIK (or I have
misinterpreted it). It was not about packages on the command line,
but about finding other packages that could be removed when a certain
package was removed.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]