Re: Doesn't "rpm -e" erase in reverse dependency order?

[Frank Cusack <fcusack fcusack com>]

On February 24, 2006 12:31:52 AM +0100 Jos Vos <jos xos nl> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 12:31:45PM -0800, Frank Cusack wrote:
>
> > Sure it does.  If I 'rpm -i foo.rpm bar.rpm baz.rpm', they are installed
> > in the correct order based on dependencies.  Or did I just imagine that?
>
> Yes, but that was not what then question was about, AFAIK (or I have
> misinterpreted it).   It was not about packages on the command line,
> but about finding other packages that could be removed when a certain
> package was removed.

Ah.  I assumed that couldn't be the question, since it seems obvious
that that isn't rpm's job.

-frank