Re: "#include" equivalent in spec files?

[Jeff Johnson <n3npq jbj gmail com>]

On Jul 13, 2006, at 12:58 PM, Jonathan Reed wrote:

> I think it's poor form to make some random macro package a  
> requirement to rebuild an RPM.
>
> I did just discover the %{expand: } macro (which is amazingly  
> undocumented), which seems to almost do what I want, but it's  
> ignoring conditionals, which seems to be a known issue, based on a  
> post to the list in December '03.
>
> So if anyone can provide insight on how to workaround %expand's  
> failing to parse conditions, that would be great, or if there's  
> some analog to %expand which does an actual 'eval' instead of  
> parsing line by line.

A simple example might elicit a meaningful response.

73 de Jeff