Re: "#include" equivalent in spec files?

[Frank Cusack <fcusack fcusack com>]

On July 13, 2006 12:58:54 PM -0400 Jonathan Reed <jdreed MIT EDU> wrote:
> I think it's poor form to make some random macro package a  requirement to rebuild an RPM.

And how is that different than %include'ing an arbitrary macro file, whose
versioning you know even less of than if it were an rpm package?

-frank