Re: "#include" equivalent in spec files?

[Michael Jennings <mej kainx org>]

On Thursday, 13 July 2006, at 14:54:16 (-0400),
Jonathan Reed wrote:

> Because adding it as a %Source ensures that it will be in the SRPM,
> as opposed to simply listing it as a BuildPreReq, which requires
> that you go get it from somewhere, and makes rpmbuild --rebuild a
> trivial one-step process.

...and creates a new, independent, unversioned copy of these macros in
every SRPM you create or build.  Or that anyone else builds.  That's
even worse than putting them in the spec file.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <mej kainx org>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Love?!  What does *love* have to do with *marriage*?!"
           -- Peter Jurasik (Ambassador Londo Mollari), "Babylon Five"