Re: "#include" equivalent in spec files?

[Michael Jennings <mej kainx org>]

On Thursday, 13 July 2006, at 15:20:12 (-0400),
Jonathan Reed wrote:

> I'm not sure how using this method prevents me from keeping the
> macros under a version control system.

I never said it did.  Though version control tends to work best when
you don't have multiple copies of the same file in lots of separate
repositories....

> I'm also not sure how the copy of the macros in the SRPM is any more
> "independent" than the actual source code files in the SRPM.

1.  Actual source code files come from an upstream source.
2.  They're versioned.
3.  They're directly associated with the original package.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <mej kainx org>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "To turn away and not become another nail to pierce the skin of One
  who loved more deeply than the oceans, more abundant than the tears
  of a world embracing every heartache."
                                       -- Jars of Clay, "Worlds Apart"