[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: querying for i386 versus x86_64 versions
- From: Tim Mooney <mooney dogbert cc ndsu NoDak edu>
- To: RPM Package Manager <rpm-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: querying for i386 versus x86_64 versions
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:59:02 -0600 (CST)
In regard to: querying for i386 versus x86_64 versions, Marcin Krzysztof...:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've noticed that on the 64-bit version of Fedora Core 4, when I query
for certain packages, they show up twice. For example, and
rpm -q samba-common
shows that there are two copies of samba-common on the system:
samba-common-3.0.14a
samba-common-3.0.14a
04:56 PM dogbert ~$rpm -q glibc-devel
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.19
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.19
04:56 PM dogbert ~$rpm -q glibc-devel.x86_64
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.19
04:56 PM dogbert ~$rpm -q glibc-devel.i386
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.19
I guessed at the fact that one is an x86_64 version and the other is
an i386 version, but I haven't been able to find a programmatic way
of disambiguating this scenario. There don't seem to be flags to --query
to provide this information, and it is not returned by --info.
On a related note, how do you specify architecture requirements on the
"Requires:" line? So that if I built my own version of samba, I could
specify that it requires both
samba-common-<myversion>.x86_64.rpm
and
samba-common-<myversion>.i386.rpm
Check the difference between
rpm -q --provides glib-2.3.4-2.19.i686
vs.
rpm -q --provides glib-2.3.4-2.19.x86_64
for ideas.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney mooney dogbert cc ndsu NoDak edu
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]