On 11/29/06, Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:16:45PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > yum's psychotic handling of transactions notwithstanding, of course. > It's psychotic b/c it makes lots of consecutive reads? Interesting. Frankly, I don't care how psychotic it may or may not be -- it shouldn't matter.
If what your saying is the case then their is no need for MySQL to support transactions anymore. That would be cool, because the code could be greatly simplified. Again, no emotion, I'm just trying to followin your logical assertions. ...james