Re: noobie question about including any file in my rpm

[Jeff Johnson <n3npq jbj gmail com>]

On Sep 4, 2006, at 3:26 AM, Douglas Phillipson wrote:

> Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > On Sep 4, 2006, at 3:05 AM, Douglas Phillipson wrote:
> > > One last question.  The ExclusiveArch directive doesn't seem to   
> > > work. I'm wanting "arm"  I also tried "%_target_cpu: arm" to no   
> > > avail.  What is the correct directive for "arm"?
> > There are several arm architectures, try one of the following:
> > optflags: armv3l -O2 -g -fsigned-char -fomit-frame-pointer - 
> > march=armv3
> > optflags: armv4b -O2 -g -fsigned-char -fomit-frame-pointer - 
> > march=armv4
> > optflags: armv4l -O2 -g -fsigned-char -fomit-frame-pointer - 
> > march=armv4
> > optflags: armv5teb -O2 -g -fsigned-char -fomit-frame-pointer -  
> > march=armv5te
> > optflags: armv5tel -O2 -g -fsigned-char -fomit-frame-pointer -  
> > march=armv5te
> > 73 de Jeff
> Thanks
> Where are these and other options documented?  I have a Redhat RPM  
> Guide (2003).  Even an online draft does not contain these  
> directives: http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ 
> ch08s02.html#id2966770

Those aren't options, but rather rpmrc configuration lines.

Why do you expect documentation of hardware arch's and compiler flags  
that may not
have existed when the documentation was written?

> Where is a current set of docs?

For rpmrc? The rpmrc file is being phased out of rpm-4.4.7 in favor  
of simpler means
to configure CFLAGS.

Otherwise, the "RedHat RPM Guide" is the last known attempt at  
documentation.

73 de Jeff