On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:41:39PM +0100, Martin Koller wrote: > On Thursday 01 February 2007, Jos Vos wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:50:04PM +0100, Martin Koller wrote: > > > Is there any way to solve this or is RPM simply not made for this > > > scenario ? > > > > The latter. You should provide new RPM's of the full product and > > give them a newer version and/or release number, so that you can > > upgrade with "rpm -U ...". > > That's a pitty, as a new package would mean ~250 MBs ... which is not really > an option if I want to deliver a patch for 1 file ... Is that one file always the same one? You can split the rpm into sub-rpms. Just make sure the inter-dependencies are ok, and then you'd only have to send the small sub-rpm. -- lfr 0/0
Attachment:
pgp6MhTsoJOAM.pgp
Description: PGP signature