[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: installing a second gcc on the same machine
- From: Michael Jennings <mej kainx org>
- To: rpm-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: installing a second gcc on the same machine
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:41:32 -0700
On Wednesday, 11 June 2008, at 22:47:43 (+0200),
devzero2000 wrote:
> Something as "--badreloc" force someone to think that the rpm
> package manager is evil
The "bad" in "badreloc" refers to the packaging, not the package
manager. It simply means that the packager did not account for such a
relocation being a possibility; this may be intentional or
unintentional.
> ad i don't think this (look at this
> http://www.germane-software.com/~ser/Files/Essays/RPM_Hell.html
While RPM certainly has its flaws, the ignorance displayed in this
essay explains about 95% of the complaints it contains. I could
respond point by point to all the false claims, misunderstandings,
etc. this person wrote, but I can't invest that much time into
something that would probably fall on deaf ears anyway.
But I don't think the name of the option implies that RPM is evil, nor
do I think that the ignorance of some users invalidates the
technology.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <mej kainx org>
Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"When my time is up, I want to know that I did one thing well: Love
somebody. The rest of this is just an expression of that one
thing." -- Julie Bowen (Aunt Gwen), "Dawson's Creek"
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]