[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re:error on LILO after RH 7.1 up2date
- From: "James P. Roberts" <punster punsterproductions com>
- To: <seawolf-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re:error on LILO after RH 7.1 up2date
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 16:03:32 -0400
> > I just ran up2date on my 7.1 box and elected to only update the kernel and
> > xinet. The Kernel went from 2.4.18.X to 2.4.20.X. I received an error at
> > the finish, "LILO test failed" this is not an exact quote.
> >
> > This box has been up and running for around 3 years and scheduled to be
> > superceded this summer, I have done a lot of patching on it over the years
> > and need to keep it up for another 4 to 8 weeks.
> >
> > Recently because I was running out of space in the partition I went into
the
> > /boot section and deleted a lot of really old versions of the kernel. I
> > guess this has screwed some index up. They are still listed in the boot
> > menu.
> >
> > Any ideas on how I clean this up? I am terrified to reboot it. (Thank
> > heaven for my UPS)
> >
> Edit /etc/lilo.conf so that it doesn't have sections that refer to
> files you've deleted. Then run lilo. "lilo -tv" will test whether
> lilo.conf seems ok without actually installing the boot loader.
> If you have a boot floppy you have an alternative way to boot if your
> normal way fails. If you don't have a boot floppy, type "man mkbootdisk".
>
In future, instead of deleting files manually like that, do the following:
rpm -qa | grep kernel
>From this, select all the packages associated with the old version(s) you want
to get rid of. For EACH of these, remove the old version from your system
with:
rpm -e package_name
Then edit /etc/lilo.conf, as described above.
Don't forget to add a new /etc/lilo.conf section that refers to the latest
version you have installed!
Run "lilo -v" before rebooting.
Personally, I always keep one old version available, in case the new one
doesn't boot successfully. So far, I have not needed it. But the first time
I don't do this... ;)
Regards,
Jim
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]