[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: new beta?
- From: Z <zleite mminternet com>
- To: shrike-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: new beta?
- Date: 01 Jun 2003 10:03:32 -0700
Plus it is really critical stuff like the IDE layer (disk corruption
risks) and several very popular drivers. A good 4-6 months until
server-class quality, unless the bug-fixing goes in overdrive. Torvalds
is talking about a 2.6-pre release pretty soon, maybe as soon as the
next release.
On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 00:30, Klaasjan Brand wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 03:40, Audioslave - 7M3 - Live wrote:
> > shrek-m gmx de wrote:
> > > have i overlooked something about a new beta?
> > >
> > > the link to phoebe-3 seems to be the latest :-(
> > >
> >
> > I checked for a new beta today. It was on Duke's server. Phoebe 3 was
> > the last listed. I too am waiting for the next beta cycle. Hopefully
> > with the 2.5 or 2.6 kernel.
>
> Don't count on it. Seems like the 2.6 TODO list is still long enough to
> use as wallpaper for a medium sized house I guess we should be really
> happy if 2.6 can be declared this year... but RedHat has backported most
> of the interesting stuff to 2.4 it seems...
>
> It might be a good idea to make 2.5/2.6-test rpm's available to increase
> bug feedback though. Thinking about making them myself, as soon as the
> more extreme disk corruption problems are ironed out...
>
> Klaasjan
--
Z <zleite mminternet com>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]