[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Distributed File System Question
- From: Anthony Joseph Seward <anthony seward ieee org>
- To: shrike-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Distributed File System Question
- Date: 12 May 2003 08:09:31 -0600
On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 14:12, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> One of my clients just opened a second office. The current setup has
> one RH server in each office. The two networks can talk to each other
> via a CIPE tunnel I setup. Users can get to files in both offices, but
> some of the files are fairly large (30+MB MS Publisher files for
> example) and it can take a long time to open or even just save the
> file.
>
> What I want to do is setup a distributed file system for the following
> reasons:
> 1) There is only on file repository with files for both offices.
> 2) Files would be "local" (read cached at least) in both offices so that
> load times are better.
>
> I have done some looking into OpenAFS, Coda and Intermezzo.
> OpenAFS seems very complicated and perhaps more than I need.
> Coda was based on AFS2 so I think it will be similar.
> Intermezzo I have not looked at much yet.
>
> Any thoughts on what the best solution is? Are there other alternatives
> I should think about?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matthew
I have a similar setup and also looked at a distributed file system. I
had more problems setting them up than I wanted so I just settled on
unison (http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/).
Tony
--
Anthony Joseph Seward <anthony seward ieee org>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]