[Spacewalk-list] Odd event...

[mark]

John Hodrien wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, m.roth2006 at rcn.com wrote:
> 
>> Well, I started looking at what I have in
>> /var/www/html/pub/<blah>-x86_64,
>> and found over 700 packages with *i386* (back to a reposync issue, I
>> think).
>> So I looked at the base channel for CentOS 5.2, and right there, on the
>> first page, is both the 386 and the x86_64. I tried to use the filter by
>> package name, to identify all the i386 packages that are in there in
>> error,
>> so I could select and delete 'em.
> 
> You're not just referring to all the perfectly legitimate i386 packages
> that would be part of a 64bit distro?
<snip>
Not when I see both a 386 *and* an x86_64 package for the same software.

	mark