[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Plea for a reasonable RHASv3 license option



Le ven 29/08/2003 à 20:08, Dax Kelson a écrit :
> IMO, there is a rather large market segment that Red Hat is not
> addressing.
> 
> The long time "guru" Linux user in small and medium businesses that:
> 
> 1. Require no technical support from RH
> 2. Want to run "up2date-nox -u" for more than 1 year

If you don't want technical support from RH, you don't need up2date.

> 3. Are turned off by the arbitrary 2CPU/4GB ram ES restrictions

It's for rhn. But since you don't need support there is no issue here.

> 4. Like administering a RH box and don't want to switch distros

Since you don't need support, i don't understand the point.

> 
> Comments?

Use Debian.
buy Mandrake Linux Corporate Server 2.1, it's only $749.
Use Gentoo.
buy SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 8, it's only $749.
build RHEL from source :
http://www2.uibk.ac.at/zid/software/unix/linux/rhel-rebuild.htm
buy support for RHL, it's only $????
...



-- 
Féliciano Matias <feliciano matias free fr>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]