[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Plea for a reasonable RHASv3 license option
- From: Stephen Smoogen <smoogen lanl gov>
- To: taroon-beta-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Plea for a reasonable RHASv3 license option
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:42:58 -0600 (MDT)
Can you give numbers on how many people that market segment is? Most of
the estimates of the ones I have seen (in my present vicinity) do not
seem very large when asked if they will pay anything over $49.00 per
box.
[Hoping this doesnt come across as combative.. taking the RHCE, with a
sick toddler, and cleaning up email messes is taking more energy these
days...]
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Dax Kelson wrote:
>IMO, there is a rather large market segment that Red Hat is not
>addressing.
>
>The long time "guru" Linux user in small and medium businesses that:
>
>1. Require no technical support from RH
>2. Want to run "up2date-nox -u" for more than 1 year
>3. Are turned off by the arbitrary 2CPU/4GB ram ES restrictions
>4. Like administering a RH box and don't want to switch distros
>
>Comments?
>
--
Stephen John Smoogen smoogen lanl gov
Los Alamos National Labrador CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 5-8058
Ta-03 SM-261 MailStop P208 DP 17U Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]