Re: Plea for a reasonable RHASv3 license option

[John <spam debian merseine nu>]

On Monday 01 September 2003 06:53, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> I can not speak for the original authors of the GPL or the FSF.. However
> go look through the archives of the various FSF mailing lists and news
> groups and see what the usual response for people who said it was
> imoral/hypocritical/illegal/etc for FSF to provide the source code and
> not compiled binaries back in the late 1980's and early 1990's.  

The question is not about who Red Hat provides copies of binaries to, but 
rather that the recipients can do with the results.

it is widely believed that "install early, install often, give copies to your 
friends" is in order, where "install often" means all your computers if you 
choose.



-- 
My bits for Taroon: http://debian.merseine.nu/taroon/